Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Looks like CC Historic District is Dead"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]here's the best piece I've read on the proposal. Quite glad it's dead. Racists gonna racist. https://ggwash.org/view/93212/chevy-chase-historic-district-applicants-admit-what-its-actually-about[/quote] I dunno. [b]Seems like the only people who are really into increasing density are white people who are *desperate* to move into overwhelmingly white neighborhoods[/b]. There's already lots of affordable housing in majority black neighborhoods that they like to pretend doesn't exist. [/quote] Chef's kiss +1000 They are very picky about neighborhoods they want to move into, cheaply--they think that building tons of 1 bedroom condo will allow them to live in the nicest parts of DC for 1500 a month. Not going to happen. [/quote] It will if you can the oldsters out lf their SFHs and into the condos. That's the next step.[/quote] You people simply want to utilize the state to force your will on others — at their expense for your benefit. Same as it always was with you people. [/quote] In academia, i.e., in urban planning and public policy, the single family home is simply not viable as a housing type going forward, especially near cities. That has been the case for about 15 years in the top programs. Most of those students are now planners (many working for government agencies), politicians, community activists and organizers, housing advocates, renters, etc. Transportation planning has not quite caught up yet, since 6 lane arterials are still built to the standards of sprawling suburbia. But freeways are finally coming down in a few cities, under Buttigieg, and road narrowing projects, with dedicated bike lanes are moving forward in cities and older suburbs where single family homes are being phased out. [/quote] This is such a bunch of nonsense.[/quote] [twitter]https://twitter.com/DavidZipper/status/1779493622871736361[/twitter][/quote] Alright well you guys can live in your cramped apartments, deal with the rampant crime and weed smokers. I will continue to live in my nice SFH with a large yard. I have to worry about getting murdered on public transit or assaulted walking around my neighborhood. Have fun with your UN resolutions lifestyle lifestyle and don’t force It on everyone else. This is not appealing to most Americans. [/quote] you can’t both argue that the market should decide (apartments “are not appealing to American consumers”) and that it should not decide (ie keep zoning restrictions). lift zoning restrictions and we’ll see what American consumers actually want. [/quote] I didn’t say that. I’m telling you let local communities democratically vote on what works best for them. I don’t agree with the top down decision making that is being forced on local communities by urbanists. Some communities will want high density and others won’t. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics