Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Harvard will require Test Scores starting next year"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I mean, obviously. The test optional thing was a weird experiment and there is no evidence that it accomplished anything useful, and some evidence it was genuinely detrimental. Good riddance. Being good at taking tests is not the most important thing in life and everyone should remind themselves of that. But it turns out that people who do test well, and are able to get very high scores on college preparedness tests, tend to also do best in college, where they will also be expected to regularly take tests. It's okay that not everyone goes to an Ivy, or becomes a lawyer or doctor or academic or MBA or whatever. It's not the only option in life.[/quote] Just realize that Harvard isn't going to accept your kids with a 1580 over one with a 1500 based on the SAT alone. They will consider them "the same"/made the cut, and then look at everything else. I don't think requiring tests will have the effect most "high stats" parents want. Fact is T20 schools only want to see your kid meet a baseline for the testing, then they still want to look at everything else. A 1600 doesn't differentiate your kid from a 1520 kid really. These schools will still be highly rejective. [/quote] Here we go with the backstop position, now that TO is being blown sky high. In fact, there’s meaningful differentiation between a kid with a 1600 / 36 and another kid with a 1520 / 34. Especially when multiple re-takes and super scoring are involved in the latter.[/quote] Yeah go ahead and believe that 98/99 to 99+ percentile means a "meaningful differentiation". The fact is most T20 (including Harvard) don't use it to differentiate that way. They can (and most likely will) still take a 1520 kid over your 1600 kid. Why? Because they look at the whole picture. They want a certain level of SAT score, based on where you live/attend school (if you are in a school with no APs in the middle of Wyoming, your threshold might be a bit lower), but once you meet that level, they look at everything else. They don't just put all the 1600 kids in a pile and then pick from that. If they did, then Harvard (and many T20s) would be 50%+ kids with 1600. And it was NEVER like that, even pre covid. Fact is they want to use SAT as part of the overall decision making process, but it's still not the be all end all determinator that you want it to be. T20 schools are looking for kids that make a difference and will be natural leaders. They recognize that the difference between 96 and 99th percentile on a standardized test is really not that much different. The Essays, ECs, recommendations, and course rigor along with GPA will matter more once you make a basic level for testing[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics