Reply to Reading in county third grade classrooms is a three-alarm fire going unanswered

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Reading in county third grade classrooms is a three-alarm fire going unanswered"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]We're in DCPS and I don't understand how this is STILL happening in MCPS. We've been pleasantly surprised to see how well DCPS has course corrected regarding reading and our own experience has been phenomenal -- all evidence-based, focus on phonics, no Lucy Caulkins nonsense at all.

We're contemplating a move to MoCo for several reasons, including schools (in a bad HS triangle in DC) and this is giving me pause.[/quote]

My second grader in MCPS has consistently been taught phonics in school since the beginning, definitely more than my current fourth grader received (I remember sight word books and “look at the pictures for clues” during the zoom school days). I don’t know where the current third graders fall. Was there a change to the MCPS curriculum with more phonics starting with the kids who are now second graders?[/quote]

RGR was implemented at most schools in the 2022/2023 school year.  I also have a second grader and it was a huge shift between kindergarten and 1st grade.  In kindergarten they were bringing home lists of sight words to memorize and being taught cueing, which I could tell was not really working for DC.  I was relieved when they actually started learning phonics in 1st grade.

So my understanding is that current 3rd graders would have gotten RGR only last year.[/quote]

MCPS also has implemented Science of Reading across all ES, has Dibels for K-2, and [b]has an RFP out[/b] for a new ES ELA curriculum.  There is reading specialist in all ES.

The above said, I’m always amazed that parents don’t think they need to be heavily involved with teaching their kids to read.[/quote]

There's a new RFP?  They actually going to make a selection this time?

IMO parental involvement should be in a supporting role- e.g., trained instructors should introduce the phonics skills and parents help their kids practice at home.  For too long terrible methods were being used in the classroom and really hard to try to get your kids to sound out the words when they are being taught at school to look at the picture and guess.  Ask me how I know.[/quote]

Parents should be in the drivers seat when teaching kids the Alphabet, basic numbers, and how to read.  Just like they should be in the drivers seat in teaching basic life skills and manners.  I’m tired of folks being like it’s really hard to do this or that because of school.  Parenting is work.  No one has ever said it should be easy.

Do I think that schools should have been using Phonics instruction all along, Yes.  But the fact they weren’t in no way stopped me from doing what was needed for my children to read.  If folks want to farm out the above responsibilities, fine that’s their prerogative.  But IMO that in no way removes the accountability from parents.[/quote]

This is hilarious.  Schools have removed so much from ES to focus on math and reading.  But now you're saying it's the parents responsibility to teach thir kids to read?  Has this memo been passed on to parents who don't speak English as a first language?[/quote]

I completely do not rely on ES to teach my child math or reading. They just don't have time anymore. All their efforts go to supporting a small group of students who struggle.[/quote]

Exactly- only struggling students get a good education anymore.  I do think this is a shock to parents who went to school decades ago.  My own parents really didn’t have to do anything unless we asked them for help on a project.[/quote]

Hmmm, my own parents were very involved in my education.  But my mom SAH and had time to help us.  Now kids are at aftercare or with a sitter until 5 or 6pm and of course they're tired and there is no time to put in the extra work.  And on weekends they are overscheduled with sports and activities.[/quote]

+1. My parents also were involved.  Reviewed homework, quizzed me before spelling test, proofread book reports, etc. Neither of them was a SAHP.  Guess it depends on what people want to prioritize.

I agree with the over scheduling of kids in sports and activities.[/quote]

DP- my parents definitely helped me with this sort of stuff too.  But I do think the things listed here like quizzing for spelling tests are a bit different than teaching a kid to read.  [/quote]

Unless your kid has a learning disability, which 85% of kids do not, it’s not that hard to teach a kid to read.  Particularly now.  Watch some Sesame Street, download an app, practice the phonics along with reading every night.[/quote]

Good god, no more apps.  They get enough of that in school.

I do wish the PSA about having to teach your kids at home had been more loudly stated when my kiddo was in kindergarten.  I learned to read in school as did my siblings.  My parents read to us and had us read to them but did not have to teach us.  I had no idea how much the approaches had changed.  I bought the schtick for a while that my kid was fine and would pick it up by following balanced literacy.  They didn't.[/quote]

I agree. They should tell parents that they need to be teaching the kids. I followed a phonics program with my kids and they easily got it. They had trouble understanding the school methods even when they knew how to read. [/quote]

Because the school methods are asinine.

No need to correct spelling. They’ll eventually absorb it elsewhere through our fabulously expensive silver bullet reading curriculum. [b]Never mind the fact that the content is boring and skews too technical (teach for the test!).

Literature. Good stories. Make it fun and interesting. [/b]

Admit that Benchmark was a big failure. Move on quickly and invest in catching up.

It’s shameful for mcps to churn out subpar students. Shameful. [/quote]

As a parent I’m tired of this line.  School is about learning how to learn and attaining certain skills.  If they can make it fun, great, but that’s not the primary goal or objective.  At school let’s get down to the business of education.  If that means it’s technical, fine.  It would probably take a lot less time and energy from teachers if they could just focus on what is needed and not all the fluff.[/quote]

Um…have you seen Benchmark? The stories were not engaging. The corresponding activities/questions were even worse.

We obviously want our kids to be challenged. I am arguing for better tools and more rigorous instruction. Better tools would be more interesting and engaging.

Anyway, I was right about benchmark not being the silver bullet they hoped for. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics