Reply to Republican utopia

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Republican utopia - Texas!"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pregnancy is also a medical condition and, in some cases, a life threatening one. If it is life threatening, ending the medical condition of pregnancy to save the living human is the best course of action. Until we develop a way to keep zygotes/fetuses growing outside a uterus, these are the decisions that must be made and the already living being should always have precedence until viability.[/quote]

In which states can a woman not end a pregnancy to save her life?
And, it is important to note that many pregnancies are considered at risk. 
Ending a pregnancy when there are challenges should not be the first course of action, especially if the mother does not want it. [/quote]

In which states can a women carry a pregnancy and make decisions about her care with her doctor, not involving lawyers and legislators and courts and vigilantes, etc.  Carry your pregnancies in those states ladies if you can.  Look to receive modern medical care instead of some backwards, compromised care.[/quote]

Which is exactly what this woman did.

She lived where she wanted. She was pregnant and wanted to be pregnant.

Yet it’s a problem how?[/quote]

She is dead.

Would she be alive if he care was governed by different laws that allowed for different medical advice and care?[/quote]

Would she be alive if she had not been morbidly obese?

Would she be alive if she taken the opportunity to enroll in Medicaid?

Would she be alive if she had taken her entitlement to receive free (paid for by Texas) and necessary medications, and taken the dose of medications as her doctor prescribed, instead of trying to work while seriously ill?

Would she be alive if she could have rested at home instead of working while seriously ill?

Would she be alive if she and her husband had left their home and rented an apartment in Dallas by a major medical center?

Would she be alive if she had exercised and eaten a healthy diet before becoming pregnant, lost weight to improve her chances of a healthy pregnancy?

Would she be alive if her husband had taken care of their family’s financial situation while she was pregnant?

This is one of the most ridiculous debates about abortion I have ever encountered.

A clearly unhealthy woman becomes pregnant and is ecstatic with her pregnancy.

Her husband doesn’t support her financially and she is forced to work.

While her health continues to fail, she still does not enroll in Medicaid.

She tells her mom she wants her baby to be saved over her in case of medical emergency.

The push to abort wanted, healthy babies over the choice of their own mothers to continue their pregnancies isn’t offensive to people?

Every baby must be aborted no matter what, no exceptions. Mom wants her baby? Too bad, abort. All women must have abortions. It makes the women who chose to have abortions because they didn’t want to be pregnant feel less guilty, apparently. [/quote]

There you have it folks, the conservative talking point about dead mothers: it’s their fault. Shouldn’t have gotten pregnant in the first place. Shouldn’t have been so poor, so unhealthy. No insurance?  Too bad so sad, not our fault. Nothing we can do but force sick women to go to term even if it kills both them and the fetus. At least it would be god’s will and not a human killing the baby. Somehow that is “pro-life.”  And “for the people.” [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics