Reply to Moco’s glass introducing bill to limit parking near public transit

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Moco’s glass introducing bill to limit parking near public transit "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]At new condos etc. meaning not providing parking spaces . How do people shop? Buy large items?  Get away to avoid a domestic abuser? He claims it costs less to not have parking spots so costs go down. Laughable [/quote]

It’s simple: Developers will get the county to build new parking garages at taxpayer expense. [/quote]

No need for that, there's already a ton of excess parking in the county.[/quote]

Developers are addicted to parking. They usually build more than the minimum because apartments with parking spaces command much higher rents than apartments without parking spaces. Maybe they’ll keep building parking themselves or maybe they’ll just get the county to do it now that they won’t have to pay the parking lot district tax anymore. [/quote]

OK, and this bill wouldn't prevent them from building more parking.  It would just not require it in cases where there was no demand for parking[/quote]

If there’s no demand for parking why has every residential building along Wisconsin avenue provided more than the minimum spaces?[/quote]

If builders are voluntarily providing more than the required minimum number of parking spaces anyway, why are you worried about removing the requirement? [/quote]

Because there’s a property tax add-on for building less than the minimum. If the minimum goes away, so will the tax. The developers will just get the county (all taxpayers) to pay for new garages, and the county always overbuilds parking. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics