Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Did TJ release the stats of admission by middle school?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There's a tremendous amount of gaslighting by the local Democrats. You might not like the tremendous learning loss due to the all-D School Board keeping schools closed so long...but the alternative is "too Trumpy." You might not like the rushed nature of the TJ admissions changes, and the strong undercurrent of anti-Asian bias on the part of the all-D School Board...but the alternative is "too Trumpy." You might not like the disproportionate amount of time spent by the all-D School Board focusing on the needs of just a few communities...but the alternative must be an adjunct to the "Moms of Liberty." You might be appalled by the neglect of facilities and the decades-long overcrowding that's gone unaddressed by the all-D School Board at some schools...but the alternative must be one step away from January 6th protesters. You might be disappointed with the continued drop in SAT scores at almost all FCPS high schools during the tenure of the all-D school Board...but the alternative "hates" the LBGTQ community. And so on. It's so transparent: you [b]must [/b] not only accept, but support, the status quo (with its constant focus on "equity," whatever that is deemed to mean at the moment, and increasing lack of transparency), or you're a bad person who either wants Trump back in the White House or a return to the Dark Ages. I call BS. People just want a well-managed public school system that focuses on academics, and recognizes and rewards merit, again. [/quote] BS. Ds are concerned about academics. :roll: When R candidates are called out for their ties to "Moms for Liberty" or for being teargassed on 1/6 - [u]that is because they were[/u]. Find some non-Trumpy candidates if you want people to stop calling them Trumpy. I'm all for transparency and even diversity of thought when it's not anti-LGBTQ MAGA nuts. [/quote] There's one candidate who attended the 1/6 rally. Clearly she wasn't one of those who entered the Capitol as she, like most on the Mall that day, wasn't arrested (and since then she has been trying to raise, not hide, her profile). Big whoop. I won't vote for her, because there are a number of people running for the at-large seats and I prefer other candidates (including one Democrat and one Independent), but the effort to paint every GOP-endorsed candidate with the same brush is pathetic. And a lot of the Democratic candidates have been BLM supporters. Many of us marched in BLM protests in the past, but wouldn't do so now given how that organization has since so clearly expressed its support for Hamas terrorists. I wouldn't bash a candidate endorsed by the Democrats because of their past embrace of that group. It would be so much better if you actually focused on the issues relevant to FCPS and public education in the county. [/quote] Vote all those bums out![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics