Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Expectant and Postpartum Moms
Reply to "Hunter for a girl?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Obvious boy names for girls is a low class southern thing [/quote] That, and a signal that the parent is sexist but too dumb to realize it. Tell me OP, would you name your boy Emma, Rose, or Charlotte?[/quote] To be fair, none of those names are considered gender neutral at all. Hunter is becoming more common for girls, : https://www.thebump.com/b/hunter-baby-name#chart Think throwing sexism around is a bit much here. Overall I don't disagree with your implicit statement that more "boy" names have become gender neutral than girl names. And, I'm sure you're right there is a lot to unpack as to why that is the case...but it's a leap to call OP an ignorant sexist. [/quote] Hunter is not a gender neutral name. As recently as 2022, Hunter is ~10x more common on males. In 2010, ~20x more common for boys. And so on. It’s not a lot to unpack to understand why parents are happy to name their girls male names like Hunter when they never do the equivalent for their boys. [/quote] I'm sorry you're uncomfortable when parents deviate from gender stereotypes when naming their child. [/quote] NP but the issue is the deviation only goes in one direction. You're not into breaking gender stereotypes, you just have internalized a lot of terrible messaging about femininity.[/quote] I was being sarcastic, which definitely didn't come through. I was the PP who said I thought calling OP an ignorant sexist for liking the name Hunter was going a bit too far and pointed out that the name was definitely trending more gender-neutral (which the PP actually seemed to acknowledge in her reply to me, perhaps without realizing). I don't think it takes a lot of insight to recognize why little girls are more likely to have "boy" names and why "gender neutral" clothing basically amounts to "boy" clothes with perhaps less trucks. I replied flippantly because I felt the poster I was responding was going to an extreme and even tried to quibble with my wording when I agreed with her and said: "And, I'm sure you're right there is a lot to unpack as to why that is the case...but it's a leap to call OP an ignorant sexist." That said, my daughters have very stereotypically feminine names (think flowers). I've gotten low-key accused of trying to push an outdated view of femininity on them as a result. Think there is little point in reading a lot into naming choices and/or making heated accusations over those choices. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics