Reply to So much for "vibrant" --boring apt. building architecture going up right and left on the Avenues

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "So much for "vibrant" --boring apt. building architecture going up right and left on the Avenues"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Brutalist architecture has always been ugly[/quote]

99% of the buildings people claim are Brutalist are not Brutalist.  That word has lost all meaning nowadays.[/quote]

Not to mention, there are quite a few beautiful brutalist buildings in DC, to say nothing of our iconic brutalist metro stations. It's a very good thing indeed that there isn't a Committee of Concerned Citizens Who Are Totally Experts on Architecture who can impose their will on developments.

The small-minded posters on this thread have a provincial view on what constitutes "boring architecture."[/quote]

FBI building, HUD, DOL...  there are many examples of brutalist architecture in DC that's not only boring, but downright butt-ugly.[/quote]

I like the Canadian embassy. I also liked the Third Church of Christ, Scientist, but...

[b]But, you know, "I like this building"/"I think this building is ugly" is not really a design standard or something that can be implemented as policy.[/b][/quote]

Also note the blustering of above PPs, moving the goalposts from aesthetics to maintenance, as though beaux arts, modern, postmodern, or neoclassical buildings cannot possibly be maintenance nightmares. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics