Reply to Boundary Study Townhalls - first one starts now

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Boundary Study Townhalls - first one starts now"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Didn't moving Eaton to Hardy and then Hardy to MacArthur address overcrowding in at Jackson Reed? Is it projected to be over-enrolled after Hardy students lose their feeder rights to J-R? I thought that the whole reason for opening MacArthur in the first place.[/quote]

This is correct. It's a non issue, but muscle memory continues to have people fighting for scraps. Even Deal is under enrollment from pre covid highs. JR will be under 1700 next year and will continue to drop [/quote]

JR is at 2200 students this year. Hardy sent like 100-150 students to JR each year. Explain the math.[/quote]

Umm..... 150 per class for 4 classes is 600? 2200 - 600 is 1600.

The JR overcrowding will be solved, but the Deal overcrowding needs a solution.[/quote]

Also, I question the 2200. 2021-2022 audited number was 2062. I'll wait for the actual audited number for 22-23 and 23-24 before believing a random DCUM. Until then, we should use 2062.

2062-600 is 1462. Not to mention the natural attrition that has been happening at JR the last few years. Students will continue to peel off for Walls, private, and now even Banneker![/quote]

Walls isn't expanding its class, so there really are no more or less kids going to Walls as before.  Walls has always attracted a fairly large %age of its classes from kids in the JR boundary.  Can't comment on Banneker...might be true, but i kind of doubt it.  Unless something has changed, I feel like year-in-year-out like 80% of Deal goes to JR.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics