Reply to Kids in high achieving schools

Forum Index » Tweens and Teens

Reply to "Kids in high achieving schools "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I was friends with someone who did part-time work at one of the competitive (but not big three) schools in MoCo. She ended up leaving because she said the kids were so stressed out and fearful of anything short of perfection. She was a high achiever herself and from a highly competitive public school in the Northeast. She thought it was not the DMV but more the times. [/quote]

It’s definitely the times. I live elsewhere and am involved in independent school leadership. We hear parents during  admissions season say they want a supportive community, a low-pressure school focused on individuals, not achievement, and a place where their child is valued for who they are. And these parents genuinely want this- it’s not fake. But once their child is in school the script flips and they want to know why we aren’t testing, why exmissions weren’t “better”, comparisons to other area schools, and explanations for why their 2nd grader is doing pre-calc.

[b]It is ALL fear and insecurity and it comes from parents who don’t actually know their own values and what they hold important. They are scared to be in touch with or even discuss what they’re trying to get out of in life, and they fall back on the safety of external validation and “achievement” once their children are old enough to be compared to others or have to compete for resources.[/b]

It’s probably the biggest problem facing schools, parents, and kids.[b] And I have no idea how it can get fixed because so few people dare to walk away from the game- and those that do are often so privileged that they are actually the ones running the game and making the rules.[/b][/quote]

I think you ended up inadvertently nailing the point here --[/quote]

But this definitely isn't the case in this day and age. The external markers of adulthood -- buying a house in a good pyramid, saving for your kids' college while also paying for daycare, medical expenses, and retirement, have all gotten incredibly expensive. Income inequality is at an all-time high.

To survive in this world, kids need to be at the top of their game economically. And that means that they have to CRUSH IT in their schoolwork and ECs in high school, get accepted into a reputable college (not necessarily an elite one, but at the very least a solid school like VA Tech), and major in CS or Finance or do pre-med.

After college graduation, young adults these days MUST go into tech or finance or into med school (with hopes of matching into a lucrative speciality, not something like pediatrics) if they want to be UMC (not rich, just comfortable) in this day and age. 
 [/quote]

DP.  Fwiw, this is incorrect.  Income inequality is at an all time high but that's a red herring.  Aside from the 0.0001%, the MC is shrinking because the UMC/UC is increasing.  The size of the LC is not growing, the MC are moving up.  Gen Z has figured out that a college degree is not worth it for many people and companies/employers are dropping these requirements.  While doctors and lawyers can be lucrative stable careers (or not), there are plenty of other avenues to UMC/UC lives for our kids.

It may be hard to see in the Bay Area, and it may be hard to see in the DMV, but we don't need to fight over Ivy/top tier schools for our kids.  The pressure and insecurity is false.  [/quote]

PP here. No, you’re totally wrong. There are NOT a lot of other avenues to the UMC for kids these days except for tech, finance, medicine, consulting, or corporate law. And where you go to college matters — full stop.

You seem like a deluded privileged person. You’re probably in the first or third category of what the PP described:

============

[/quote]

There are not a lot of other avenues for YOUR kids outside of what you've listed, because you've made them believe that. But that is not true for all other UMC kids.[/quote]

+1  Thinking about PP's analysis of the "types", I think I'd put my family in group #1. We're not at a private school but kids went to a high-achieving/UMC public HS. I think a lot of our contentment, or confidence, that our kids will do fine in life if we just support them in pursuing their interests and they go to solid but not “the best” colleges, mainly comes from looking around at the people we know, the young people we work with and in our families, and seeing that plenty of people are getting along fine in life without buying into this idea that the only way to success is a T20 college + doctor/lawyer/hot tech job. As long as you don't define "success" as making the absolute highest salary you possibly can.

DH and I and my siblings all went to middle of the road public colleges and have done just fine. Professional careers but not the big money dr/lawyer/etc. BIL's kids (all Millennials) didn’t go to college at all and all are gainfully employed and home owners (in a lower COL city). Among my large group of cousins, I’ve seen a lot of their kids launch into solid careers from a huge range of schools in recent years so it's not just an outdated GenX memory. I work with people from all kinds of colleges. I just don’t get the fear. I do acknowledge that my kids, particularly one interested in a less high-paying path, may need to set sights on lower COL areas but that’s the trade-off she will need to make in prioritizing her passion and she fully recognizes that. We did discuss it as she thought about majors, colleges, etc.

We’re not 1%’ers but are able to send the kids to college without debt (public U for one, LAC w/ merit for the other) and I anticipate they will each get some inheritance from my mom (now in her mid-80s) which will help them with an initial downpayment for a first home purchase. Those two things are a huge leg up for getting started in life. So yes, we are privileged but a lot less than other who seems so stressed out about this. Maybe because the higher you go in income, the harder it would be for your kids to replicate that income?  Maybe that's just not a reasonable expectation at some point. Especially not if you have to destroy your kids' mental health in pursuit of it.[/quote]

[b]Do you recognize the privilege that you've grown up with and/or live now?  [/b]You point towards your anecdata as reasons why college rankings don't matter, but peer-reviewed studies by Chetty and others have consistently shown that college rankings matter.

[/quote]

Some of the people most stressed out about this, most focused on it being so important that their kids go to top ranked school have a ton of privilege. Their kids will be fine if they go to the #80 ranked school vs. #10. [/quote]

Especially if it is for an in-demand job.  My DD went to a lesser known engineering college and graduated in 3.5 years making 6 figures.  She had a fantastic scholarship and only has about 12K in student loans. She was a little upset about turning down better colleges with less scholarships and also not getting accepting to some.  But in the end, by winter break of freshman year, she was in love with her school.  Perfect match.  Find your own way [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics