Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "German court bans circumcision for non-medical reasons"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If you are counting on circumcision (rather than abstinence, condoms, etc) to avoid STDs, you are in trouble. [/quote] OMG no one is counting on circumcision as the sole method of avoiding STD's. That does not mean that we should ignore the benefits of partial protection. Are you "counting on" false dichotomies to prove your case on circumcision?[/quote] But if you still need to use a condom to avoid STDs and HIV, then what exactly is the point of circumcizing? Circumcision contributes nothing additional. There is no difference between circed under a condom, and un-circed under a condom. Even if you have the circ, the condom is doing 100% of the work. Are you "counting on" logical fallacies to prove your own case?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
