Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Why the middle class has a huge disadvantage in admissions."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What’s the gist of this article/video for those who can’t see it?[/quote] Has little to do with most the comments here about donut hole aid. It's referencing the recent NY Times article which is a summary of this research paper: [url]https://opportunityinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/CollegeAdmissions_Nontech.pdf[/url] Controlling for other factors, students already in the 1% are significantly more likely to be admitted to elite schools. Students in the 1% are slightly more likely to apply, that explains 20% of the disparity. Students in the 1% are more likely to attend if accepted that explains 12%. But students in the 1% are simply more likely to be admitted. This in turn breaks down into three categories. They are more likely to be legacies, 46% (they also get a bigger legacy bump 5 fold for a legacy with income of $660k vs. 3 fold for a legacy with income $83k-$116k). They are more likely to be recruited athletes, 24%. But the remaining 30% is simply that their files receive higher non-academic ratings: [quote]The remaining 30% of the admissions advantage for students from families in the top 1% is explained by the fact that they are judged to have stronger non-academic credentials (e.g., extracurricular activities, leadership traits, etc.) than students from lower-income families. The relationship between parental income and non-academic credentials is mediated by high schools. Comparing non-legacy applicants with the same test scores, demographics, and parental income, Ivy-Plus applicants who attend non-religious private high schools are twice as likely to be admitted as those who attend public high schools in affluent neighborhoods. Conditional on SAT/ACT scores, the academic ratings of students from private high schools with high admissions rates are no higher than those from public high schools, but their non-academic ratings are much higher. Since children from the top 1% are much more likely to attend private high schools, these differences in non-academic credentialing across high schools contribute to the income gap in admissions rates to Ivy-Plus colleges.[/quote] [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics