Reply to Justice Alito senile?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Justice Alito senile?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Great rebuttal to this idiotic thread:

The self-described “independent, nonprofit newsroom” ProPublica has waged a smear campaign against Supreme Court justices. ProPublica targets only conservative donors and justices, but there’s another tell that its work is a partisan attack rather than a consistent application of ethical principles: In highlighting cases and votes, ProPublica journalists are so selective as to be egregiously slanted.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/alito-paul-singer-and-obergefell-conflict-same-sex-marriage-propublica-fishing-f2a062bd[/quote]
You mean like they’re just like Judicial Watch and Project Veritas?[/quote]

Sure - which you would *immediately* discount if those were the sources.  Propublica is a completely biased, left-wing rag.  And all of you know it.
DP[/quote]
You seem cool with your right wing rags, so why the double standards?[/quote]

That you call a Pulitzer-winning newspaper a "right wing rag" tells us all we need to know about your utter lack of standards.  [/quote]

Dp...  I'm confused here...  ProPublica is not right wing but is a Pulitzer prize winner.   However, Veritas and Judicial Watch are right wing and never won any Pulitzers.[/quote]

The WSJ - quoted in the above piece - is Pulitzer Prize winning.  [/quote]
And it’s become a right wing rag. Glad we could all clear that up. DP.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics