Reply to Florida school deems Michelangelo's David statute pornographic

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Florida school deems Michelangelo's David statute pornographic"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think most reasonable people can discern the difference between a child reading about explicit sex and what is depicted in the Bible and by Micheangelo. But most people, I have come to conclude, have abandoned reason in this debate in furtherance of their political and social causes. [/quote]

Well it’sna good thing that no child is reading about explicit sex in elementary school.

But I am curious why conservatives are so much more hyped up about kids being exposed to sex than they are to violence.

When my baby was baptized someone gave us a book of illustrated Bible stories for little children. I ended up giving it away because truly, they were all awful stories — God flooding the world and killing off most of mankind, people being thrown into a lion’s den to be mauled to death, and so on. NOT appropriate for small kids!!  Also have you read that one about Lot sleeping with his daughters? Or the slaughter of the innocents? Even the brutal killing of Jesus or the stoning of the adulterous woman—way too mature of themes for children. [/quote]

Cain with the big rock and angry face right before he bashes in Abel’s head and then Abel’s lifeless body is forever etched in my brain from our little Sunday school lessons.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics