Reply to Do you consider 45 to be ‘old’?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Do you consider 45 to be ‘old’? "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm 41 and told everyday I look younger. No wrinkles have smooth skin perfect vision never had any back pain. I am fit and lean when I used to be fat all my 20s and early 30s. When I was 25 or so I could pass for 15. I'm 41 now and pass for 21. Booya[/quote]

Don't kid yourself.

I'm the same weight I was when I was 21, I work out regularly and keep myself healthy and trim, people flatter me by saying I look great (mainly because I never put on weight) but there's no denying I've still aged.

When you were 21 you never confused a 40 y/o with a 20-something. Why would you think differently now?

[b]45 isn't old. But it is approaching middle age. [/b]For most people you are now over halfway through your life. And people in their 40s are often starting to reach senior levels/career peaks with the demands that come with it and alongside that have to deal with growing children and aging parents. I deal with all these and no amount of astute anticipation ever prepared me for the reality.[/quote]

45 is middle aged, not approaching it. And I say that as a 45 year old. Nothing wrong with that.[/quote]

I'd say it's past middle age for most of us. Most people don't live to be 90.[/quote]

Well, my father lived to 93.  My mother is in great health at 90.  Most of my aunts and uncles lived into their 80s.

So to me, 45 is middle aged.  Those of you with less healthy bloodlines might be old at 45.  But those of us with healthy ancestry can certainly consider 45 middle-aged easily.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics