Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "What is the future of heterosexual dating when the number of men attending college continues to drop"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Humans are generally pretty realistic about calculating where they will need to settle to find a mate. It will work itself out. The nonsense about polygamy or a subset of men dating all the women is of course nonsense. The vast majority of people want normal traditional relationships and male educational attainment certainly isn’t enough to shake that. [/quote] It’s not at all nonsense – it’s very well-documented that this is what’s happening right now, not even at some point in the future, with online dating. Because women generally have unreasonable dating standards (the college degree example in this thread being one of them), they only swipe right on the top 10-20% of men. So you have something approaching 100% of eligible women contacting 10-20% of all eligible men and ignoring the other 80-90%. This is a bonanza for the top-tier men and gives them no incentive to stick to only one woman. Hence all the complaints from women about the dating pool being only comprised of losers and players. Women are essentially shooting themselves in the foot by clinging to such unreasonable standards.[/quote]Weird post. Are you saying that college is where people learn to treat women well? People that don’t go to college meet lots of women, also and with the number of assaults on college campuses, I wouldn’t hold college to any high standard in the respect hierarchy. They are not unreasonable standards. The college eductated is more than just the degree. It means men have socialized with women in a way that they show some respect. One of the reasons co-ed schools came about was so that men and women could learn to get along with each other better and it also enabled higher marriage rates. Often it means they can work with women respectfully in a workplace. Unfortunately, many men took the red pill advice to look down not just on women but feminine virtues with capitalism supporting this notion and the lack of religion in the country supporting getting rid of feminine virtues and now they have nothing in common and no interest in accommodating women. So many men you hear these days saying something to the sort of "what would a woman bring to my life as a wife? What does she bring to the table for me?" They are hooked on this idea that they should have ultimate freedom their whole lives and this person they are with should be like a prize for them. Nothing about children. They are intrinsically disordered against family. Not interested in the pursuit because other women are available for sex. Before men had less availability for sex and so they felt they achieved power through their jobs and their families and were tempered by both of these with bosses and societal expectations. There are very low expectations in society and so all these men just want to play around and not really do anything useful for future generations.[/quote][/quote] Yes, statistics say that males who are not college educated have very narrow views of women and many of them negative. Whenever you attend school or attend a workplace with women or are married to a woman, you will learn better skills to work with the opposite sex.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics