Reply to Sinema registers as independent

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Sinema registers as independent"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why would she do this? Running as an independent ensures no Dem in AZ will vote for her (or only they very disillusioned would) and it will split the Republican vote because the GOP will run a MAGA candidate. [/quote]

You answered your own question. She is part of the Koch funded "greens" astroturfing who was more politically successful than anyone could have imagined. She isn't and never has been a progressive green party representative.[/quote]

You don’t know much about her then before her Senate days. [/quote]

You don't know much about the far right astroturfing "the green party" do you. Look at Jill Stein as another example.[/quote]

But her party change causes defeat for GOP not the Dems [/quote]

How so? Low information voters will see her name and vote for her. Hardcore dems will vote for Gallego. The GOP will vote for whoever the put up. The GOP will win in a plurality. She is splitting Dem votes, not GOP votes.[/quote]
I know this last election was more than a month ago now, but I think it pretty clearly showed, particularly in Arizona, that Republican voters will not just vote for whomever the GOP puts up. [/quote]

That's certainly true, but a large number of them will.  Both Masters and Lake got 49% of the total vote statewide, despite being absolute nutcases.  If that block holds, and Sinema peals off even 2% of the republicans or independents who voted for Kelly and Hobbs, then the republican would win.  [/quote]

I'm liking more and more Georgia's law of needing over 50% to win.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics