Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "British colonialism killed 100 million Indians in 40 years"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is a very weird thread A lot of people and civilizations in history did a lot of crappy stuff. We focus on the especially terrible (holocaust/ slavery) bc the human to human evil is recent and can be understood as evil even absent context. What do you want us to do about the macro economic public health impacts of a 2 century old regime? I don’t think we can hold Harry styles and Adele accountable [/quote] Well you can start by saying Uk was built on a Holocaust of 100 plus people. It is weird people think the legal system imposed on these people makes a everything okay. [/quote] No, the British committed some atrocities in India but this study uses some questionable assumptions and points fingers without much historical support. The periods of time when the British were in control were peaceful, during the times of civil unrest, those were the periods of famine.[/quote] Seems like a lot of famines during British rule. For sheer per capita impact, it doesn't come close to what they British did to the Irish, but by sheer numbers they were happy to let a lot of Indians starve to death https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_major_famines_in_India_during_British_rule[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics