Reply to DC statehood: Things that make my blood boil:

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "DC statehood: Things that make my blood boil:"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Thus far, nobody has given any good reason for DC to remain without representation on the final passage of legislation in congress.

The only thing argued thus far is that the founding fathers designed it this way, which is not good enough an argument, especially in light of the real historical context there (was not a unanimous decision, was immediately protested, was a controversial decision at the time with debate about concern for disenfranchising district residents, was not certain at the time that congress would remain in DC so might be a temporary situation, and on and on)

I've not seen anything else other than "stop whining." and it doesn't matter because it's a lesser injustice than other injustices.  "You don't have it as bad as others have had it"

In conclusion, the opposition really doesn't have any good reason other than being cranky hate change types.[/quote]

So, if a decision is controversial, not unanimous and protested at the time, that means it is not binding and valid?  Not sure you have traced through the implications of that thought...[/quote]

The constitution was meant to be amended to changing times. Controversial then and still controversial today means the solution was not sufficient.

Our government was meant to serve the people, not dominate them.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics