Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Police handcuff kindergartner for tantrum"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] I'm not saying that at all children with violent tendencies are not entitled to a public education. But no not 100% of them are and that why there are psychologists who make that determination. [/quote] They are in fact all entitled to a free and appropriate public education. But whether they are too violent and aggressive to receive that education [b]in the context of a regular public school classroom with other students[/b] is a different question. If a child inflicts serious bodily injury on someone at school, they can be placed in an "interim alternative educational setting" for up to 45 days. 20 U.S.C. 1415(k)(1)(G)(i)-(iii). A permanent placement in an alternative setting requires notice, the right to a hearing etc. [/quote] I was referring to the bolded item above. I understand they are entitled to a free public education, I did not say anything about the entitement of a free public education in general. I am referring to them being in a public school with other children based on special needs and behaviors. As you quoted there are alternate settings for the appropriate situation. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics