Reply to SCOTUS Protection Request

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS Protection Request"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There is zero proof Ginni has done anything wrong. None.

Also, are you okay with people who disagree with the 3 who dissented getting daily protests, their churches visited and their Children’s schools published. [/quote]

Of course not.

You see.... the standard is simple. 
If they are liberal Justices, or Justices who vote in a way which liberals approve, they are most deserving of protection.  
If they aren't liberal or don't vote the right way, they absolutely should be protested and threatened.  [/quote]

No one is saying the justices should be threatened.  And no one is threatening them.[/quote]

DP.  Why are you lying?  Wow.  I'm sure you're aware a man traveled to Kavanaugh's house for the express purpose of murdering him, right?   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/08/armed-man-arrested-outside-brett-kavanaughs-home-after-threatening-supreme-court-justice.html[/quote]

Lone wackjob with mental health issues who turned himself in.  The guy stalking Sotomayor was far more dangerous.[/quote]

Just to be clear, are you asserting that a “lone whack job with mental health issues” is not a threat?[/quote]

In this case he actually wasn't.  He was the one who turned himself in.

The main point was in taking issue with your insinuated conflation of that lone wack job with every single person exercising their legitimate and protected First Amendment rights to protest at their houses.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics