Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "OP from an earlier thread back with an update. "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]You’re making the right choice. One thing you might consider is taking advantage of the addict-repentance stage to get everything documented— he admits to his addiction, admits to endangering the child, admits to illegal behavior, in a way that you can use to achieve full custody. Consult a lawyer (obviously!) but there’s no reason to waste this phase.[/quote] Waste this phase?? You're disgusting. As someone who's been working the program for 10 years sober, please do NOT take this pp's advice, OP... that is, unles you want to end up divorced? Because THAT was an extremely manipulative thing to suggest... I hope you never have mental health or addiction challenges, and have family that are like you & treat you the way you suggest. If you're trying to help a loved one who's an addict, you're supposed to demonstrate all of the positive traits that you would like him to work on (such as transparency & honesty) in the hopes that he will begin to emulate you. What you're NOT supposed to do, is act cold, calculating & untrustworthy, especially while they're looking to you for support & in their most vulnerable state. [/quote] Disgusting poster you’re quoting here. You didn’t read the thread before being outraged? The [b]OP is seeking a divorce[/b]. She does not want to stay with and support the addict who is freeloading on her while she is 16 weeks postpartum, endangering her newborn and lying to her about mental illness to make sure he has enough free time to get high. Much easier that she takes this time to document so she gets full or majority custody— and as another PP suggested a non-substance use clause— than spend even more of her life being jerked around by this guy. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics