Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "anyone hear-- there's a GT forum for MoCo"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] I am not sure I understand what the label stuff is about. Why do we need to label each level of learners? I thought the law required identifying GT only? What is the GTA position about what GT means? [/quote] If MCPS ever provides many levels of identification for academic readiness to cater specific services for each level instead of services for each age group, it may be ideal. I do not believe it will happen in my life time and I am fairly young :) However at this point there MCPS identifies children as “gifted and talented” in grade 2. I believe GTA uses that identification to advocate for services. However, they do not advocate only for average learners as some people will like everyone to believe. They are advocating for all advanced learners whether they are at 60th%tile, or 90th%tile. Some people might want GTA to fight to provide “GT” its commonly accepted meaning instead of talking in MCPS’s lingo of GT kids . But GTA probably has limited resources and would like to focus on one advocacy at a time, the current advocacy is to get accelerated services back to neighborhood schools. [quote]I just don't want to get into name calling ... so please excuse me if I don't go there. What does the GTA consider to be GT? Above 50th percentile? 70th? 90th? I think the question the poster asked about bylaws is also good. Do you know where I can find them? Just trying to know more about an organization you know a lot about. [/quote] If you did not engage in name calling, you do not have to worry about it. When people run out of actual argument, they resort to name-calling. It reminds me of my discussion the other day with DC about the concept of “ad hominem”. Like I mentioned before GTA uses the same meaning for GT as MCPS. MCPS, BTW, does not say what GT standard is whether it is 50th %tile or 90th %tile, we would never know. Yes, the bylaw question is good. I would love to learn about GTA a lot more, but at this time I am more concerned about what they support case to case basis. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics