Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Coalition4TJ’s request to block TJ admissions process DENIED 6-3 by Supreme Court"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Asians are so gullible to fall for this TJ ruse. [/quote] Please keep this to your self smarty pants! As an asian, I think the new process is bad and not thought through well. I would have been perfectly fine with lottery instead. Or, it would have been much better if fcps allocated quotas to school pyramids (or [b]'base' [/b]middle school) and then with in each pyramid, allocate a set percent to poor kids. Then do all the selections, included allocated, based on GPA and teacher recommendations with out any essays that doesn't really test STEM. If fcps wants to go an extra leg, they could do 50% for school based allocations and leave 50% for open selection. This way, we at least know what to expect rather than giving 25% bonus points to an unknown number of kids. For example, if Franklin gets 10 admissions, we have no idea of knowing if all those 10 kids got in because of the booster points or only a few - it would be better if 3 of the 10 admissions are pre-allocated for poor and 7 for others. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics