Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts on Friday called for a response from a Virginia school"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Are these legal battles the best use of fcps tax dollars? Maybe if they spent more money on other aap programs people wouldn’t need to clamor so hard to get into the scarce resource that’s TJ Just get rid of all race on apps[/quote] TJ doesn’t have race on the app. [/quote] [b]Disparate impact[/b] is a recognized legal theory.[/quote] Interesting. So if certain races have much lower acceptance rates & enrollment #s than others is that a disparate impact? [/quote] It basically means something that is race neutral can still be found to be discriminatory if it results in having a disparate impact on a protected class. Something that is race neutral can be a proxy for doing something racist if it has the result of being discriminatory against certain races. It depends on the facts and who and how it impacts. [/quote] For godsake. destroying a school for equity purposes is absolutely obscene. you guys make me sick. Right. So the current admissions process has a disparate impact on admissions for URMs — significantly lower rates of admission. [/quote] Is that what the facts show? What if you look at % of applicants of each race who applied that are accepted? [/quote] Yes. We already did that analysis on another thread. [/quote] Ok thanks. Why do we only care about URMs? There are poor Asians. And we didn’t have Hispanic people as slaves so it’s not reparations for them to be URMs. Sorry if that was already discussed. [/quote] Friendly reminder that poor Asians were the biggest beneficiaries of the new admissions process per the data that was recently released - far moreso than Black or Hispanic students...[/quote][/quote] This is not a competition to divide the spoils!! you guys just don't get it...[/quote] So we should only care about “disparate impact” for certain groups, not all? [/quote] That's literally coalition for TJ's argument. They are claiming the the current system has a disparate impact on Asian applicants even though the prior system had a disparate impact on literally every other group. [/quote] On the other hand - that Omeish text is a really bad fact for FCPS here. I really think that text is having an impact.[/quote] It's not surprising what people will say and do when they believe they are on the right side of history. Gott mit uns.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics