Reply to Employees reveal Google has cut the pay of WFH staff

Forum Index » Jobs and Careers

Reply to "Employees reveal Google has cut the pay of WFH staff"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Guys, I'm not sure the issue here is about working in an office v. working from a home.

This is about appropriate compensation based on geographic location.  The rationale would be the same if a company hired somebody to work in a HQ office in NY or a satellite office in Tucson....[/quote]

No. Some of it is definitely about whether being in an office is or isn’t more valuable and therefore deserving of more compensation. COL is also a factor but not the only one.[/quote]

Exactly. For example, I worked with plenty of people who work in DC or tech firms in Reston who lived way out in West Virginia and would commute for 2-3 hours a day. They lived in a low COL town but still got compensated at a typical salary. They didn’t get penalized because they lived out west. So it’s all about control and wanting people back in the office because those companies are paying millions to lease out these buildings.  It’s not like you’re working less because you live somewhere else. [/quote]

I don’t know how many times we can point out that this is not what these policies actually do.  You don’t get paid more for coming into the office. [/quote]
Then what is the point of the policies? Give me one logical explanation. [/quote]

They are not logical.[/quote]

The point of the policies is what it has always been for decades- to pay people what is necessary to attract the talent and no more.  If you live in Minnesota, I can pay you 100K and you will be happy.  If you live in Silicon Valley, I need to pay you twice that.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics