Reply to TJ admissions decision - repercussions for Class of 2026

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "TJ admissions decision - repercussions for Class of 2026"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They could just have a lost year. No 2026.[/quote]

Nope. There was nothing in that ruling that said they had to abandon decisions for this year. It’s next year and beyond that will be changed. [/quote]

When a party is "enjoined" from something, it doesn't mean next year. It means immediately, unless a stay is issued by the court or a higher court stays the ruling in some fashion. Federal judges are not known for their sense of humor on these points.  And federal courts don't just wait around til "next year" to see if you'll maybe, possibly, pretty please address the unconstitutional harm that you have caused.

FCPS cannot use that admissions system unless the 4th Circuit steps in.  And the Circuit Court of Appeals will not do so until asked to by FCPS, which even then is not a given and will likely take some time.  At this point, FCPS will need to come up with an alternative process regardless unless they wish risking contempt charges.  FCPS is running out of time on all fronts.

I feel for the kids involved in this process.[/quote]

This is thoughtful.

Could the school board just announce a new process or would they need to go through the normal steps of public comment, community engagement etc?

I agree that they are running out of time. [/quote]

There is significant precedent for a speedy resolution for a stay of an injunction. As long as the case remains with the 4th Circuit, which it would for some time, they would have jurisdiction to issue the stay quickly so that the process could continue for 2026.[/quote]

Dream on. [/quote]

That's what these so called liberals insisted when the lawsuits were filed. No way Jose would the plaintiffs win. Mocking them every step of the way. Who's laughing now?

Check out what happened to Berkeley when they asked the SCT of CA for a stay of CA Ct of Appeals' order that affirmed lower court's order to cut freshmen admissions by more than 35% this year when the decisions will be going out next month. CA Ct of Appeals said no and now CA Sup Ct said no.

https://calmatters.org/education/higher-education/2022/03/uc-berkeley-enrollment-cap/[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics