Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Youngkin & Miyares state they will challenge federal vaccine mandate for hospital workers "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m vaccinated but I fail to understand why people care if others aren’t. Vaccinated or not, you can transmit covid. Vaccinated or not, you can get omricon. From a fact based perspective, the people we should be mad at are the obese. They are the ones (vaccinated & not) who have bad covid outcomes. [/quote] +1 million Also vaccinated and feel the same. I am SO fiercely against these vaccine mandates. They go against science and they go against facts/data. The only benefit I see is the financial benefit to companies (Pfizer, CVS, Walgreens) and their shareholders. [/quote] “Against science”? You are fcked in the head. [/quote] Actually, you are the ‘fcked in the head’, as you so eloquently put it if you believe that there is enough solid science to back up any kind of booster mandate whatsoever. An Omicron-specific booster will not even be available until March of 2022. And there is no data to show that getting a third (or fourth) shot affects outcomes. Knock yourself out getting as many shots as you want, but until the data is available, it’s all a shot in the dark. [/quote] This is 100% correct. Why don't you (prior PP) go read up on the real science before posting your "you are fcked in head" useless comment. You are uneducated on the facts, ill-informed and not following the actual scientific studies on this issue. And no, I am not going to do your homework for you. Find the info yourself and study up. [/quote] You are definitely fcked in the head. Is this a new thing? Or were you already fcked in the head before the pandemic? https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2022/01/no-omicron-immunity-without-booster-study-finds/ [/quote] Why don't you try reading the abundance of studies on hundreds of thousands of people from multiple countries regarding how effective the booster is against omicron instead cherry picking one study of 70 people which is missing a lot of data, such as how long ago those people were boosted and any follow up testing. Most studies are showing you maybe get 10 weeks of protection with the booster, then it is about 30% effective at most against omicron. Given the number of people double vaxed with a booster and still getting omicron, just empirical data alone should be obvious this is the case. Doesn't mean it does nothing, such as prevention from more serious illness, but the current vaxes and boosters are not a significant preventatives for omicron. [/quote] This. The vaccines are useful, mandates are not. [/quote] Of course they are useful. They lower the chance of serious infections - which are very costly to businesses - longer absences and higher medical costs. [/quote] Oh, so now we need public Covid vaccine mandates so that businesses can make sure their workers are not absent. What kind of argument is that? Not in the public’s best interest, but we need mandates because it is in the business owners’ best interest. Good luck pushing that argument, but at least you are being honest about our intentions with these vaccine mandates.[/quote] There are benefits for both businesses (like hospitals) and the community. It's in all of our best interests to have as many people healthy as possible. [/quote] Well then, I certainly hope you vocally support an anti-obesity mandate. Losing weight likely has even more of a protective factor and keeps as many people healthy as possible. Yet, I’m not hearing any mandates for that. [/quote] I fully support businesses/government mandates to provide whatever we need to eliminate obesity. Restrict junk food, soda taxes, etc. Subsidize gym memberships. Mandate businesses offer breaks for exercise & offer healthy food options. Great. So we will mandate vaccines & offer healthy lifestyles. :lol: [/quote] That’s not the same at all. Taxes on soda? That’s just trying to disincentivize people. It’s not a mandate. A mandate would be more equivalent to a: Soda Ban - no soda sold at any store anywhere Junk Food Ban Yet, you’re not advocating for that? Just taxes to disincentivize people from buying those items. You want to offer bonuses to people for getting vaccinated? Go for it. I have no issue with that. But mandates? No way. [/quote] Awwww. Don’t be a spoil sport. I was just playing along with PP’s dumb strawman. Guess we should back up. What does PP mean by an “anti-obesity mandate”? Let’s hear it. 🍿 [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics