Reply to SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So what would an overturning of Roe mean for Assisted Reproductive Technology?  I had 6 embryos from my IVF.  All were genetically defective so I did not proceed with implantation.  Will the destruction of un-implanted embryos be illegal in a post-Roe world?[/quote]

Claire McCaskill just said that there’s already a law on the books in Missouri that states that personhood begins at conception. She says that would make IVF illegal.[/quote]

Missouri republicans would say well families can just adopt all the unwanted babies that will be born after abortion is overturned. Which won’t happen. There is a dearth of babies given up for adoption because more women or their relatives are choosing to keep them. That won’t change. [/quote]

It might, though, if there are simply too many. Imagine if every junkie popped out five opioid addicted kids, or every college woman gave birth to her oops pregnancy.  I think part of what is motivating these laws is that supply has gone down at the same time natural fertility is going down. Hard to live God’s commandment to be fruitful and multiply when you couldn’t afford to marry until 35, or you have so many forever chemicals in your blood your gametes are fried. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics