Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "wife cheated - should I expose her on social?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I was in a similar situation but in your wife's shoes. Ex wanted to post all over how I was a cheater or whatever. If your wife makes money off of her social media following, you can get in big trouble for interfering with her ability to earn income. That's illegal. It's like calling her place of employment to report her for cheating, either it'll do nothing, or she can come after you for the money she lost as a result. Judges also hate petty stuff like that. If you go to court and whine about what she said on social media, it's going to reflect poorly on you. Also, it just makes you look petty and more at fault. Ex tried to expose me to many people and the vast majority just thought he was crazy.[/quote] Haha how do you figure it’s illegal? Is is illegal to mislead your followers? GTFO. [/quote] Because I spoke with multiple attorneys on the matter and had to threaten a lawsuit. I have a friend who went through a similar situation, he owned a dental practice and his ex-wife would try to sabotage his business. He finally had to sue her. You can't do that, it's illegal to interfere with someone's ability to earn income, and you can be held responsible for lost wages. Everyone on social media misleads their followers. You think any of the fitness models you follow got that way through the diet and exercise program they're peddling you? Nope, it's genetics and performance-enhancing drugs. [/quote] I think you may have slightly misunderstood your lawyer. There is a cause of action for tortious interference with prospective advantage. But, one of the elements of the claim is that you have to negligently or intentionally breach a duty owed to the plaintiff. The claim may have applied under whatever circumstances you were dealing with, but here, where OP would truthfully state that he is not the father, would not trigger a viable claim. He has no duty to her ex to pretend to be the father of her child or otherwise refrain from correcting any factual errors. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics