Reply to “They need cleaned up”

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "“They need cleaned up”"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Linguist here- what about “might could”? Anyone use that, and for the grammar mavens, does that grate, too? As in, I might could go to the store (meaning, Maybe, I’m the future I might…”). [/quote]

I knew two people who used it regularly, one from Maryland and one from North Carolina.

The Marylander was in my graduate English program, and I once heard her talking to an undergraduate about how to revise a paper: "Well, I was going to suggest that you X, but you might could -- to use the vernacular of my youth -- try . . . ."  It didn't bother her enough to stop using it; I think it falls under the heading (or rubric, to borrow some pretension from my past) of "Wrong but useful."

The people I knew who used it meant it in the sense of "Here is an option you should consider, but I'm not telling you you have to do it."[/quote]

But might or could already achieve that. "Might could" is redundant. Just pick one, the meaning is the same (the people who use it).[/quote]

It adds nuance. That's one of the most amazing things about the English language (tho let's be honest it's really three languages in a trench coat) is the complexity of construction and massive, nuanced vocabulary. I also LOVE regionalisms, slang, creole etc etc. Loosen up and don't be a prescriptivist[/quote]

+1. I use these constructions (they're called "double modals"), I grew up in NC, and they have subtly different meanings for me. This is especially true for ones using "ought" "I might ought to do that" (which I say pretty often) doesn't mean "I might" or "I ought," it means it's possible that doing that is the correct thing to do.[/quote]

I've actually never heard someone say this in the wild but I don't see the nuance. It means the exact same thing. I don't know why people are splitting hairs and insisting there is a meaning change.[/quote]

DP.  Redundancy doesn't mean it's a construction that shouldn't be used.  People use double negatives.  It adds nuance, whether you see it or not, the speaker does.  I've heard and used might could and might oughta.  Regionalisms and dialect have meaning, even if sometimes very subtle.  [/quote]

I don't care if people say it or not. It's not said at all in my region but I wouldn't interpret it the way you think it should be interpreted. Is it being said for your benefit or the listener? It's just a waste of words if other people don't get your meaning. But carry on being verbose.[/quote]

You seem to believe you are superior in this argument, but you can't see that in being pedantic, you are showing an ignorance of spoken linguistics, which is a fascinating field of study, and the reason most people don't ever succeed in native fluency of foreign languages -- they fail the spoken dialect test.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics