Reply to Nirvana 'Nevermind' album baby sues for being exploited as a minor

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Nirvana 'Nevermind' album baby sues for being exploited as a minor"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If they had slapped a photo of a basket of strawberries on the album cover, the album still would have been a hit.

The cover of the album has nothing to do with the success of the music.

He (and his family) have used this photo as a way of making themselves more than they are -- he was a baby model, no different than the Gerber baby.

Honestly, I've seen that cover a million times and never thought or give consideration to the fact there's a penis on it.  It's a BABY.

[b]No one would even know it's him except for the fact he's used it as his calling card all of his life -- even to the point of tattooing the name of the album on his chest.

Maybe he just needs to grow up and get a life.[/b]

[/quote]

This. The man has CHOSEN to draw attention to it being him on the cover, going to the media for years, doing replications of it as an adult, and of course the giant tattoo - and clearly trying to profit off of it himself years later.

I've never been a fan of the album cover, but the only people that exploited him were his parents.

I think it would be a kind gesture to give him 100k as a gift, maybe, since the album has been so popular (because of the music, not the cover). But he isn't owed it by any means.
[/quote]
All of this.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics