Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "S/O Surprisingly good Hollywood casting decisions"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]90% of these replies are not at all “surprising”![/quote] Always good when the quality assessor turns up on a thread. What a fricking kill-joy you always are.[/quote] Well, there has to be one on every thread. I’m pretty sure that’s a rule in the DCUM internet user agreement. [/quote] Oh come on. What is the point of starting a topic of "surprisingly good Hollywood casting decisions!" if people are going to answer stuff like "Julie Andrews as Mary Poppins!" As if everyone was shocked that Julie Andrews could play that role. [/quote] Exactly. The surprising casting example would be Julie Andrews in Victor/Victoria -- though she was directed by, and presumably cast by, her husband Blake Edwards. [/quote] +2. I mean, yes, Reese Witherspoon was good in Legally Blonde but what is surprising about casting her there?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
