Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Lacrosse
Reply to "Nest level lacrosse: girls"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Next Level is not on the same level as BLC -- I don't believe they made any cuts for certain years and their rosters are gigantic. BLC is tough to get a spot and playing time but the coaching seems good and the girls seem to develop quite a bit while there.[/quote] There are some factually and obviously false statements in here. Particularly the one about roster size. I think only the NL 2027s have a large roster and while I admittedly don’t know the details, my suspicion is that they picked up a lot of kids leaving MC. But I am also growing increasingly skeptical with this comparison where NL is inferior to BLC. Just looking at fall results, and considering that BLC currently terminates at 2025, I would need someone to point to me where they are objectively dominant over NL. They have one obviously good team, but even the much vaunted BLC 2027 seems to have dropped a level. After that, some years BLC might be better but others NL are better. [/quote] Does NL go through high school for girls?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics