Reply to 42-43 too old for a baby?

Forum Index » General Parenting Discussion

Reply to "42-43 too old for a baby?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Well if all three of your kids are beautiful, smart and perfect, the odds will say that eventually the dice will roll something else.
Also, before deciding, you might want to review the many threads from women in their late 40s complaining how crappy they feel.  At 42, I was like “why do people complain about 40?  Age is a state of mind.”  At 48, half the time I feel like I am 100.  Not sure I could handle a 5 year old....especially while also handling teenagers.  [/quote]

46 with a five year old and I certainly don’t feel 100. On the go all the time and no issue going on adventures, splashing in water parks, riding roller coasters and jumping off boats. Just depends on the person. [/quote]

With all due respect, what you haven't yet experienced is that there is a much bigger difference in the way you feel at 56 versus 46, as compared to 36 and 46.

Get back to us in 10 years and you'll see what I mean.[/quote]

At 56 this hypothetical baby would be a teenager... and OP would have another teenager in the house still. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics