Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Pets
Reply to "Are pitbull mixes safer?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Hi 9:11 - PP that shared the sarcastic Anthony Hopkins quote here. I think the concern with your angle is that it is a risk that is much greater than what you’re allowing room for. I agree I’d factors to reduce risk (as donating PP) in loading shelters with dogs who aren’t resourced to have a true background is just another failed opportunity for stop gate. The resolution is likely a mix of a bit of what everyone is suggesting: owner awareness and responsibility/training, breeding restrictions/penalties to discourage misbehavior, and possible waivers for owners of Potts that carry a highest cost “risk insurance” in some way to decentivize ignorant dog owners (which most are, unfortunately) It’s like saying all crack babies aren’t sentenced to addiction and arguing against funding for Just Say No campaign awareness, resisting enforcement crackdowns on corner crack dealers, and offering no incentive for planned parenting funding to prevent pregnancies that are a burdened societal cost. The points and counter points here are mutually inclusive. There are a lot of creative solutions that combined ans put in practice can address concerns from both sides. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics