Reply to Parents: Would you support a teacher strike if it means there is no DL?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Parents: Would you support a teacher strike if it means there is no DL?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

It’s honestly ridiculous the number of parents that are absolutely wishing for a teacher strike. It seems like more parents than teachers! Do you want your kids in school or not?! [/quote]

It's honestly ridiculous that you can somehow blame concern about strikes on parents, instead of the union.  Which is, you know, threatening to strike (like they did in November). [/quote]

Right? It's the worst logic!

"Teachers didn't strike!"

"Actually they did in November!"

"But they're not striking now!"

"They're discussing striking!"

"You can't talk about them striking!"

"Why?"

"Because they're not striking a this very moment!"

"But teachers are talking about striking."

"That doesn't mean YOU can talk about striking!"

...apparently only teachers can talk about striking, and parents are forced to only think about the present, and not potential futures.
[/quote]
 
Do you know how a strike vote works, sweetie? Maybe try getting off the Internet and picking up a book. Just because the exec board discusses a strike vote doesn’t mean there will be a strike. It doesn’t even mean there will be a vote!
Teachers are literally TEACHING IN PERSON CLASSES RIGHT NOW! Some of you will just never be happy.[/quote]

Hello. I would like to introduce you to the future conditional tense: https://www.englishpage.com/conditional/futureconditional.html
You may also be interested in learning about the future subjunctive tense: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjunctive_mood

This was covered in middle school.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics