Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
General Parenting Discussion
Reply to "“Police officers AREN’T our friends”"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]WTH is structural racism? There is racism and there is no racism. Structural racism sounds like racism but it’s no one’s fault you see. No one is accountable but you still get racism. [/quote] Another term for this is "institutional racism" and I would argue that this was the type of racism that was ingrained in the structures or institutions of society. For example, in states that had segregation coded into law, you could be a non-racist waiter, but still not be permitted to serve a black person at a whites-only lunch counter. Or, you might be a minister who was totally fine with interracial marriage, but until 1967, you could not marry a white/black couple in the state of Virginia. These are examples of institutional or structural racism--the affects of which are still around today. Another example...until middle of the 1950s, there were many law schools that did not admit blacks. So while their white counterparts might enjoy the privilege of having relatives or connections to friends of relatives who are alumnae of certain laws schools who can write them letters of reference to their alma mater, which in turn helped them to create more attorneys in the family...blacks did not have this opportunity. When you consider that the FIRST black law students were admitted in many of these schools in southern states only in the late 1950s, one can only imagine how low those numbers were and how long it would take to "catch up" to similar numbers of white attorneys. (And yes, I realize that not every white dude knows another white dude lawyer...but there's a reason that it's often referred to as an "old boys" network.) Does it mean that today's admissions officers or lawfirm partners are racist if they don't admit/hire the black candidate? No. But the "system/structure/institution" is stacked against this.) FWIW, I think that the response to the recent murder in Minneapolis is actually cause for HOPE in this regard. If the system were condoning this, the cop/murderer would not have been arrested and charged. The DA is acting appropriately and is actively demonstrating against the city being structurally racist.[/quote] In 2020 we are well past demolishing structural racism. Kudos to enormous strides. To say people feel discriminated against at this point because while no one is actually racist but it’s the “system’s” fault really points to unwillingness to accept accountability (perhaps not your own personal) but the accountability of someone who is actually racist and discriminated and maybe killed someone because their racism valued this person’s life less than another person. It sounds like you are making up excuses for some people to not have to change their behavior.[/quote] If we had done away with structural racism, there would not be disparate outcomes based on race. The same percentage of black people as whites would be poor. The same percentage of black people as whites would own homes. The same percentage of infants born to black mothers would survive as do those born to white mothers. The same percentage would graduate from high school, from college, etc. But we don't have that yet. Either people of different races are inherently different (and that is an explicitly racist view), or there's something very unfair about how society treats people of different races (systemic racism). [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics