Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Despite the hoopla, judge smacks down US women's soccer team"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]Has anyone even read the decision? Most of the articles are leaving out some relevant facts, including that the USWNT was paid more per game. The women played 111 games and made $24.5 million overall, averaging $220,747 per game. The men played 87 total games and made $18.5 million overall, averaging $212,639 per game. Even though women’s bonuses were lower, they received other benefits under their collective bargaining agreement that did not apply to men. The women received guaranteed annual salaries, bonus pay and other fringe benefits. The men, on the other hand, were paid under a pay-to-play model, which doesn’t pay players unless they participate in a training camp or make a particular roster. And although the women would have been paid more if they had been operating under the men’s contract, the opposite was also true; the men would have been paid more if they had been operating under the women’s contract. https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/federal-judge-tosses-unequal-pay-claims-by-us-womens-soccer-team-allows-other-claims[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics