Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "APS Elementary Planning Mtg at Swanson - Option 1 in, Option 2 out, McKinley Moms out of contro"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Again, the geniuses don’t realize Ashlawn’s demographics will change to be a lot more like McKinley’s. It won’t be a 7 for long. Also, dominion hills property is pretty stable. McK houses aren’t worth more than Ashlawn houses. [/quote] Lol keep telling yourself that, 17% low income vs 5%, anything over 10 is a shit show[/quote] [b]Most of Ashlawn's low income families will be rezoned to other schools under Option 1.[/b] [/quote] Supposition. No one will ever know until boundary changes [b]after[/b] these school moves. Big worry: these school changes reduce options for later boundary changes and result in overcrowding in some schools and under capacity at others. [/quote] ....so, let's do nothing, and have 3 elementary schools (Reed, Mck, and Ashlawn) within less than 2 miles of each other, and draw weird tentacle boundaries to fill them? And leave current, known seat deficits on the other end of the county? Yeah, THAT won't reduce options for later changes or result in different utilization across schools... :roll: The "but the solution isnt perfect! Let's wait!" argument, which boils down to "don't do it and effect us, screw other people instead with the status quo," is really getting old.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics