Reply to DH texting much younger woman on Signal, should I worry?

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "DH texting much younger woman on Signal, should I worry?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
I disagree that Kellyanne Conway was attractive when she was younger. Her actual face is ugly. I’m sure she looked better but I’m sure she always had her big chin and horse face. That said...Kellyanne and George make sense in a way that Melania and DT don’t. As loathsome as she is Kellyanne seems smart and career focused. She has been [b]successful as a woman in the space she works in[/b]. George also seems career oriented and intelligent. Plus I could see them at home gossiping about people. 
[/quote]

I don't disagree that she's gotten ahead.

But let's be clear: Kellyanne Conway's career is ... lying for money.  
Specifically, lying for money from wealthy right-wingers who need to lie to the base to get votes for the GOP agenda.

Kellyanne would have a lot more trouble making money in a career where the company had even a smidgen of principles.  I can tell you, as a former PR person, that she'd have bombed out of a job at a big PR firm.  She's good at lying and selling, but even the big PR firms have a tiny nib of principle and their clients want that.  Look at the NRA - they had to go with a pretty small regional PR firm (Ackerman McQueen) because the big agencies didn't want that kind of blood on their hands, even back in the 1980s.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics