Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Latin replication pulled from PCSB agenda"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Schools dont need to be all things to all people, esp charters. Latin is good at being a classics based program, close connected community and pretty high college placement across all demographics with lots of scholarships and grants. Personally I think its hokey for Latin to replicate in an underserved neighborhood, rather than a central location - but I imagine with more seats there will continue to be kids in low SES neighborhood for whom the description above could be of interest? [/quote] Uh, the very reason for charters in DC is to try innovative approaches to reach underserved children, and to improve outcomes. [/quote] Is it really true that Latin is good at it, if so many of its AA studentd are scoring well below grade level?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
