Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "Muldoon unacceptable"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's so funny that people think that BSC is using Muldoon's because they want to, or that they don't know it's a sucky field. Why do clubs use lousy fields? Because they have no alternative. Or, more specifically, the alternative is not offering the program at all. Fields are scarce, and getting access is difficult and can be byzantine. This is especially true the closer you get to the city and more expensive real estate becomes. It's not like a club can go to "Fields R Us" and just order up as many fields as they like. They have to go with what they can get. Why do clubs offer programs when they don't have the facilities to support them? Because people will sign up for them anyway. [/quote] Is this supposed to be some kind of excuse? It’s falling flat to me. [/quote] It's not an excuse, it's an explanation. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics