Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Solving the Wilson Feeder crisis - charter schools"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]A mega-elementary school is a ridiculous idea.[/quote] The other alternatives are build 1100+ new seats WOTP (at around $100K/seat) or send 1100+ kids EOTP for elementary school. Or maybe lose those kids to privates and Bethesda. [/quote] If you send my kid on an hour commute to MS or HS, you will lose us to private or MD. If we wanted long commutes, we would live in the subury. More importantly, you would not find an educator in the country who would say that a mega elementary school would be good for the kids. So, fine, build more schools. Why not? It’s beside the point that there is capacity on the other side of town if they haven’t managed development accordingly.[/quote] It's not an hour commute from Mt. Pleasant to MacFarland or Shepherd Park to Wells. Also, if you go to private, we'll still have your taxes and not have to educate your kids. If you go to MD, we'll get the transfer tax when you sell your house and someone else (who will earn plenty of money and pay plenty of taxes) will replace you. DC, and DCPS, don't really care if you stay or not. [/quote] From my home — and from much of upper NW to Mt. Pleasant is 15-20 minutes by car, probably 40 minutes minimum by public transportation. What high school woth so much free space are you envisioning sending the Wilson kids to? The space is mostly in East of the River, I believe. Meanwhile, we don’t own my home, we rent, mainly to have flexibility for schools when faced with the uncertainty of DC schools. We moved once to be near our preschool and once to get the ES right. We can move again, and you will get no transfer tax. Finally, There are lots of people like me. And when we all move, [b]who is going to buy our homes and rent our apartments[/b] when their kids will then go to a poorly-conceived elementary school and MS and HS far outside the neighborhood? Real estate values — and property taxes — will plummet.[/quote] Young professionals without kids. The largest, wealthiest and fastest growing demographic in the city. Truth is families with children use the most city services (schools, summer camps, rec centers and fields, free transit, tax deductions). We are just not the most desired residents from a city planner's perspective -- my family's $150K in income is taxed at a lower rate than the single person across the street. They also eat out more and don't use schools etc. As for holding property values, my Ward 4 home has appreciated 100% in the 10 years since we bought it. And our IB DCPS schools are 1- and 2- STARs. But we are near a Metro, which is more important. [/quote] Young professionals without kids are not buying the zillions of 4 bedroom Colonial SFHs with a yard in Upper NW.[/quote] This is the core of the problem: much of the family friendly housing in the city is in Ward 3. That does a lot to make Deal huge. Upper NW needs to upzone. But DC shouldn’t want to be a city of transient millennials. If they want people to put down roots and be proud of the city and their communities, they should want families to stay and raise kids here. That means both supporting family sized housing and supporting good schools.[/quote] So SFHs or upzone? [/quote] Upzone to denser housing - 3-5 BD townhouses and apartment blocks. SFHs are basically the reason why housing costs inside the beltway are ludicrous.[/quote] This is already happening, despite the near-daily gaslighting by GGW and its sycophants. Between City Ridge (former Fannie Mae site) and the parcel next door, 1,400 apartments are going to come online in the next five years on Wisconsin Avenue just south of Tenleytown, adding to the massive apartment buildings that line both Wisconsin and Connecticut avenues (some of them quite new, like 5333 Connecticut and Park Van Ness, and more are to come). But remind the GGW crowd of all this development and you get crickets. And then ask the GGW crowd where all these new residents are going to send their kids to school -- no, they all aren't going to be DINKs -- and they actively plug their ears.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics