Reply to 5th grade -Capitol Hill

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "5th grade -Capitol Hill "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If Brent, Maury and Watkins each lose at least half of their kids in 5th grade, one idea is to move to two middle schools, one for 5th and 6th, the other 7th and 8th and have all Hill schools feed into the two schools (yes, I know, there are more than those three schools), but it strikes me that there is a serious feeder problem with those schools in particular, and also SWS.[/quote]

But it's an idea with no chance of seeing the light of day ever, mainly due to the political clout Cluster supporters enjoy, and have for decades.  That's it, that's all.

This is an idea only bandied about by Hill parents who lack familiarity with the political landscape on the subject.
[/quote]

This is the weirdest myth, or maybe just out of date since SWS spun off. Watkins loses all of its inbound kids by 5th just like the rest of the Hill schools. Not sure why you think we’re running the table.[/quote]

Come on, it's no secret that the politically connected Cluster leadership has fought every middle school solution that would have worked for the entire Hill community tooth and nail for decades.  Individual UMC, IB parents like yourselves may not have done this, but Cluster admins, parent leaders and the Cluster dominated CHPSO as an organization certainly have.

[b]Watkins' student body remains mostly OOB[/b], as does its parent leadership.  During the 2013-2014 DCPS boundary and feeder review, the well-organized and resourced Cluster PTA and CHPSO pulled strings on the city council and with Rhee and Henderson to keep Brent, Maury and SWS (in the early stages of the process of breaking off from the Cluster) from gaining by-right access to SH or a new pan Ward 6 middle school entity from being created.  They also ensured that Tommy Wells was onboard with a 45 million dollar SH renovation, while Eliot-Hine and Jefferson got zip.

The Cluster's small-minded and selfish advocacy worked like a charm.  Weirdest myth, hardly.  Huge problem for Hill parents of elementary school age children, absolutely. [/quote]

This is a false narrative.  Watkins was 30% IB last year and continued to trend higher this year (exact figures not yet released). This shows continuing progress.  Watkins also doesn't have the IB benefit of ECE where schools like Brent, Maury and Ludlow Taylor's IB % gets inflated.  Peabody is by far the largest ECE program and has 75% IB.  Combined with Watkins, Peabody  serves nearly 700 students (ie Maury and SWS combined).  [b]Brent is 2/3 OOB, they don't take new students (OOB or IB) in 5th grade when the class shrinks and its ECE is 100% IB[/b][/quote]

These numbers are a couple of years old now. I think the numbers is now closer to 80% IB.[/quote]

no -- it's as recent as Watkins at 30%.  2016-17 from DCPS school profile[/quote]

And since the 2016-17 school year, the largest class in recent memory entered the school (the basically 100% K class) and there were over 40 5th graders, most IB. So yes, 66% is no longer correct.[/quote]

So what's the hypothetical number on Watkins?  Is it now 40-45% IB because the published number is also dated or do you just assume it plummeted to 0% because DCUM?  At what point does anyone let go of Watkins as "mostly OOB school" when the evidence is clear that it's moving in the opposite direction?

As far as Brent goes, I'm more impressed with the dozen or so students going to Jefferson this fall than the Pollyannas using it for free preschool before decamping to suburbs.[/quote]

I'm watching on the side as you two go back and forth, but why are you asking her what's going on at Watkins when you're the one making the claims about Watkins? Brent Mom rebutted the 2/3 OOB Brent claim (which apparently never matched the published data). I don't see any reason that Brent and Watkins would have increased by the same percentage IB since SY16-17. It would be interesting to hear someone in the know comment on Watkins, but just saying "it must have gone up too since the 30% number was as dated as the Brent number" doesn't sound very convincing.

How obtuse are you?  The numbers haven’t been published for any DCPS school.  Any 2017-18 number is pulled out of PPs ass
[/quote][/quote]

__WARDEN NORTON
"What? What did you call me?"
__ANDY DUFRESNE
"OBTUSE [emphasis added]! Is it deliberate? The country club will have his old time cards! W-2s with his name on them!"
__WARDEN NORTON
"Dufresne, if you want to indulge this fantasy, that's your business. Don't make it mine. This meeting's over." [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics