Reply to why do people care if Kate Middleton wants to be a SAHM?

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "why do people care if Kate Middleton wants to be a SAHM?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]NP. There's nothing wrong with someone (any parent, not just the mom) wanting to be the one to raise their children.

Good for her that she's doing what she wants and feels is best for her kids![/quote]

That's fine as long as she's not being subsidized by British taxpayers. [/quote]

Not really

It is a great thing for the British monarchy to have a royal mom putting her young children first.

How fortunate they are that Kate has her priorities straight.[/quote]

Given how the popularity of the monarchy is steadily declining and there is now open conversation about ditching the monarchy in the UK in a way that is unprecedented, I wouldn't say Kate and William have done such great things for the monarchy.[/quote]

That is because of Charles and Camilla.

The boys and their wives, but especially their wives and kids, are the best thing about the monarchy.[/quote]

I'm actually watching Charles and Camilla with this new bride closely. It's been no secret that William & Kate froze mostly Camilla out and by extension Charles. They don't really like doing joint events with them, Charles is rarely seen with one or the other, and the Middletons are always the first to be invited to see the new babies - not the future King of England.

I'm thinking Charles & Camilla see a chance to get in good with Harry & Meghan instead and already waging that campaign. We'll see a lot more pictures of them laughing and working together - pretty much a given at this point.

The official working event 3 days post-wedding was the first.[/quote]

That's because Meghan possesses a work ethic. [/quote]

She does seem to have a great work ethic. I hope you're right that both she and Harry will be friendlier with Charles and Camilla. [/quote]

Charles betrayed his mother. I couldn't fault him if he was polite but didn't want a close relationship.[/quote]

He's also the future King. I think William made a grave mistake by freezing him out for 10 years and Kate for allowing him too + egging it on (she really doesn't show any amount of respect/concern for Camilla). Charles is already beaming with pride at first being [i]given[/i] a prominent role in Harry + Meghan's wedding and then doing a joint role with them and Camilla later that week.

I don't know how Charles will act as King and Camilla as Queen but being lazy is one thing. Being lazy [i]and[/i] disrespectful is entirely another.

[img]https://peopledotcom.files.wordpress.com/2018/05/meghan-17.jpg[/img][/quote]

So what that he's the future king? So is William. Do you think that means they can go around breaking vows, lying to people, generally being disrespectful to the people they're supposed to love the most?

I guess you think the president should be allowed to do whatever he wants as well? And Oprah, because well she's Oprah? And the royals in other countries who are corrupt and siphon all the money that keeps most of their country living in poverty?

Fame, or birthright to a title, doesn't give people the right to behave like a jerk. And when you treat people badly, you can't expect them to be in a hurry to treat you better than they need to in return.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics