Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "New APS Elem Boundaries (ASFS)"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] [b]I also think I called it earlier[/b] when I said one of Discovery, Jamestown or Nottingham will become an option school, ATS or otherwise. They specifically said too many times that they'd look at areas with overlapping walk zones as places where you could move an option school. There are PUs that are within the walk zone for all three of those schools. My guess would be Jamestown, because so many of the students there are already bus riders, it really doesn't affect them to ride a bus to Discovery or Taylor instead. Plus it will give them an excuse to given Jamestown a much-needed renovation without it being prioritizing North Arlington students at the expense of others.[/quote] I can't stop laughing at the smug. Moving a choice program so far from SArl eliminates attendance by parents who need to use public transportation and extended day. Talk about prioritizing the privileged. [/quote] Then don't complain about the schools up there being undercapacity while others are overcrowded. This the solution to that. If you don't want to move a choice program up there, you are choosing for those schools to stay the way they are. We're not playing with legos were you can just take the whole set-up apart and move pieces around to wherever you want. The schools are where they are and we have to work with that. You can keep being lazy about the whole thing and just pick apart and complain about whatever solution someone else comes up with for not being perfect. Or you could do the hard work of looking at the maps, thinking critically about what your realistic options are, and then coming up with a solution. Clearly the staff is doing that. I tried to do that in looking for ways for balance out enrollment across the county and coming upon this solution. What's your suggestion that deal with actual facts and community priorities?[/quote] NP to this thread. I don't think it makes sense to move a CW program to a less accessible place. Placing a CW program in an area like that makes it more difficult for disadvantaged families to even apply. It's a disproportionate burden for them. However, looking at the potential south side boundaries as they relate to the MS boundaries, I think maybe there is potential for an under capacity Barcroft to become a CW program. The school could use a renovation and a slight expansion would be feasible. It is a smaller property so would be good for an option program with a capped enrollment. That way they could use the larger parcel where ATS currently sits for neighborhood seats so there would be room for expansion. I think once they move Alcova Heights PU's to the new Fleet, Barcroft will be even less crowded. How will they fill it? Barcroft neighborhood could be zoned, split between Barrett and Randolph. . If they need a choice program in the N, maybe they should make a second ATS? Seems like it could fill based on the depth of their wait list.[/quote] Cool, us Discovery families can keep sitting under capacity. Works for me.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics