Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Kaya Henderson formally reprimanded for giving special treatment to her friends "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think children of teachers and administrators should be weighted for admission. Teachers take a LOT of work home. Shaving off any time in their commute logistics by having children at the same school allows there to be "more of them" for all the children. It's also a vote of confidence in the school, and teachers who are teaching their colleagues children have added incentive (though probably not needed) to do their very best. [/quote] This this should be examined and perhaps made a policy. But let's not continue with a practice based on not what, but who you know.[/quote] I understand what you are saying and completely agree. It should be completely transparent and lawful (he certainly changing current rules). Kayas actions were abysmal. However, if we weight siblings for public charter or geography for public I'd say we can weight teachers kids for both ... Perhaps just weight then in the lottery when the teacher makes their choices for their reasons. I can't tell you the impact of morale when a teacher is happy with their own child's placement.. Seems a weird thing to skimp on. [/quote] There are 4,025 teachers in DC, 115 principals and 3500 staff members (counselors, registrars, custodians). Probably another 200 APs. Should they all get a preference? Where do you draw the line? Would the preference be above IB with sibling enrolled? Higher than OOB with sibling? [/quote] I would start with teachers. They come early, leave late. They offer after school classes. They take planning and grading home. Having their child onsite, in pre or aftercare as well is a huge boon for their ability to do their best work. Private schools in the area grant admission to teachers' children unless there is a huge fit problem, and faculty morale and school climate appear to be very high. If we need more spots, perhaps we need more great schools--and it would behoove public schools to begin attacking that conundrum by realizing that great schools often have happy, invested teachers...which they surely would be if their children were in the same place. I've taught in both public and private in DC and I can tell you--public teachers are generally punished, scolded and squeezed to 'high performance', private school teachers earn less but are supported up to and including work/life balance. That has a return which is energy, loyalty, enthusiasm and creativity. I would definitely start with the teachers and give them a weight if they wanted their school age children (not every teacher will have a child who would be the right age for the school) to attend.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics