Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "NIH Budget Cuts"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/22/opinion/why-trumps-nih-cuts-should-worry-us.html?_r=0 Harold Varmus has written a decent opinion piece on he proposed budget cuts to NIH. Gives a good overview of how NIH budget works with federal appropriations. [/quote] More of the same. "Junior scientists, already struggling in a highly competitive atmosphere, may not get a chance to have an academic career. Senior investigators might need to lay off staff, disrupting research teams and leaving projects unfinished." NIH doubled the budget in late 1990-s. It has marginally helped the biomedical Ph.D employment for a few years, then it became a lot worse once the increases stopped. Why would it differ this time? Doing the same thing and expecting a different result is the definition of insanity as we know. In contrast, there is no National Institute for Financial Research or National Institute for Legal Studies awarding postdoctoral grants and awards to new business Ph.D and J.D and young faculty in business and law schools. Somehow those "junior scientists" start their academic careers just fine, in fact they are commonly fought over by multiple schools at 100K+ assistant professor salaries right after Ph.D with no postdoc. Why is that the case? Largely exactly because there is no NI... to fund the "training" of graduate students and postdocs in the field beyond the demand of real economy. People are self-funded (which they would not do without a strong chance for a lucrative job), paid by the departments as TA (with few limited spots based on real educational demand), or sponsored by employer based on real need for that qualification. If an external entity stimulates the supply by funding the "training", the product price is permanently depressed - this is basic economics. But they think the solution is to put even more money into supply. That is what NIH grant PIs do: fund more students and postdocs (NIH does not pay to create more tenure-track academic positions). [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics