Reply to Epstein Files

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Epstein Files"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The more I hear about Epstein, the sicker it gets. I had not realized how vile these people are, and how brutally they had treated the children they used and abused.

I hope they all get taken down for their crimes. [/quote]

We've heard from Kash Patel that there's nothing to prosecute.   Even though we see with our own eyes that heinous disgusting crimes have been committed against dozens and dozens of young women.

The Trump administration is complicit and is covering for the animals who did this.[/quote]

I don't think he will do that, wasn't he working undercover for the FBI what it happen? I read on  Facebook the only reason his name is on the list  was because he was working for the FBI and they didn't want anyone to know so he had to pretend he enjoyed it. [/quote]

"He was working undercover for the FBI" = PURE FICTION.

This is more of that deranged, delusional QANON "Trump is our savior" porn.

There is zero evidence, even with all of the releases, that Trump was working with the FBI, serving as an informant, actively trying to dismantle the pedophilia and trafficking.  Where are the indictments and prosecutions?  Bondi and Patel are doing NOTHING.  And if he were this valuable informant, then why have all those involved gotten away with it, why did Ghislaine Maxwell get transferred to cushier accomodations, why has he given so many other sleazebags pardons, and so on?[/quote]

I don't know where that is coming from, but I read a lot of conservative media and I have NEVER seen that Trump was working for the FBI.  However, I also don't believe he was involved in the trafficking.  There is no evidence of that.[/quote]

Epstein believed that Trump turned him in in the initial (2008?) prosecution as revenge for the real estate transaction they were competing over. Trump was the “dog that didn’t bark,” presumably in the sense that his name didn’t come up during those investigations when it would have been expected to come up. The silence about Trump made Epstein believe that Trump cut some kind of deal behind the scenes to give dirt on Epstein in return for keeping Trump out of the investigation.

So I can see where there’s a small kernel of truth behind the “working with the FBI” claims. If I remember right, didn’t the “undercover” myth first come from Trump’s circle itself? At the time I thought they were spinning desperately and hoping to see what sticks, but now with the “dog that didn’t bark” stuff, I wonder if they were working from the knowledge that Trump DID give inside info in 2008. Still, there’s a long way between actually working for the FBI and a co-conspirator who cuts a deal to keep his own sleaze quiet in return for giving info.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics